From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frederick v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Jan 28, 2015
155 So. 3d 1253 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

No. 4D14–3223.

2015-01-28

Nyro FREDERICK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; David F. Crow, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50–2007–CF–017335–AXXX–MB. Nyro Frederick, Century, pro se. No appearance required for appellee.


Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; David F. Crow, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50–2007–CF–017335–AXXX–MB.
Nyro Frederick, Century, pro se. No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Defendant's claim that his consecutive minimum mandatory sentences are illegal because they arose from the same criminal episode is rejected for the reasons stated in Williams v. State, 125 So.3d 879 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (en banc). CIKLIN, LEVINE and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Frederick v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Jan 28, 2015
155 So. 3d 1253 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)
Case details for

Frederick v. State

Case Details

Full title:Nyro FREDERICK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Date published: Jan 28, 2015

Citations

155 So. 3d 1253 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)