From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frederick v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 27, 1985
472 So. 2d 463 (Fla. 1985)

Opinion

No. 65534, 65979.

June 27, 1985.

Two Consolidated Applications for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal — Certified Direct Conflict and Direct Conflict of Decisions, Fifth District — Case Nos. 83-1432 83-1431.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender and Brynn Newton, Asst. Public Defender, Seventh Judicial Circuit, Daytona Beach, for petitioner.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Margene A. Roper, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for respondent.


We review two decisions of the Fifth District Court of Appeal, Frederick v. State, 459 So.2d 326 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984), and Frederick v. State, 451 So.2d 1066 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984), which expressly and directly conflict with T.L.J. v. State, 449 So.2d 1008 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984), quashed, 464 So.2d 1196 (Fla. 1985); and Bennett v. State, 438 So.2d 1034 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution.

Based on our decision in L.S. v. State, 464 So.2d 1195 (Fla. 1985), we approve the decisions of the district court.

It is so ordered.

BOYD, C.J., and OVERTON, ALDERMAN, McDONALD, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Frederick v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 27, 1985
472 So. 2d 463 (Fla. 1985)
Case details for

Frederick v. State

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM FREDERICK, PETITIONER, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT. (TWO CASES)

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jun 27, 1985

Citations

472 So. 2d 463 (Fla. 1985)

Citing Cases

Graham v. State

Our inclusion of the charge of attempted burglary in the first quoted sentence above, but not in the second,…