From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frederick v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Apr 29, 2005
899 So. 2d 1281 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Opinion

No. 5D05-275.

April 29, 2005.

3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County, William A. Parsons, Judge.

Gilbert Frederick, Bristol, Pro Se.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Lamya A. Henry, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


Gilbert Frederick appeals the denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Based on the State's proper confession of error, we reverse the order denying Frederick's motion. As the State correctly observes, while the trial court's denial of Frederick's claim may be proper, the trial court did not attach portions of the record establishing that Frederick is not entitled to relief. Consequently, we remand this case to the trial court for attachment of portions of the record that conclusively refute Frederick's claim. See Collins v. State, 805 So.2d 73 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Abney v. State, 661 So.2d 139 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

SAWAYA, C.J., ORFINGER and TORPY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Frederick v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Apr 29, 2005
899 So. 2d 1281 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)
Case details for

Frederick v. State

Case Details

Full title:Gilbert FREDERICK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Apr 29, 2005

Citations

899 So. 2d 1281 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Citing Cases

Petscher v. State

This is the appropriate remedy in instances where it appears that the trial court's order may be correct, or…

Jackson v. State

Because the trial judge did not attach portions of the record supporting his conclusion that Jackson was not…