Opinion
Civil Action 24-01355 (UNA)
07-10-2024
DARION FREDERICK, Plaintiff, v. NONNATIVE, Defendant.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
TREVOR N. MCFADDEN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Plaintiff, appearing pro se, has filed a Complaint, ECF No. 1, and an application to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2. The Court will grant the application and dismiss the complaint.
Plaintiff has sued “NONNATIVE” at an unknown address. Compl. Caption. In the one-page complaint, Plaintiff writes “Enriching endeavers [sic] are for the indigenous; unprecedented remarks of treachery and betrayal.” Following equally unintelligible references, Plaintiff concludes “I am a Vessel.” Plaintiff seeks no relief.
Complaints, as here, lacking “an arguable basis either in law or in fact” may be dismissed as frivolous, which “embraces not only the inarguable legal conclusion, but also the fanciful factual allegation.” Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989). Furthermore, a court must “dismiss the case at any time” it determines the action to be frivolous. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). Consequently, this case will be dismissed by separate order.