From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frederick v. Findling (In re Arliss)

Supreme Court of Michigan
Feb 2, 2024
SC 166487 (Mich. Feb. 2, 2024)

Opinion

SC 166487 (54) COA 362013

02-02-2024

In re ESTATE OF CYRIL GEORGE ARLISS, also known as CYRIL ARLISS, also known as GEORGE KROLIKOWSKI. v. DARREN FINDLING, THE PROBATE PRO, REGINALD ANWAN MILLER, also known as REGGIE MILLER, and NINA PETTIS, Defendants-Appellees. DANIEL FREDERICK, Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF CYRIL GEORGE ARLISS, also known as CYRIL ARLISS, also known as GEORGE KROLIKOWSKI, Plaintiff-Appellant,


Wayne PC: 2019-848862-CZ

Elizabeth T. Clement, Chief Justice, Brian K. Zahra, David F. Viviano, Richard H. Bernstein, Megan K. Cavanagh, Elizabeth M. Welch, Kyra H. Bolden, Justices.

ORDER

Elizabeth T. Clement, Chief Justice

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendants-appellees Darren Findling and The Probate Pro to extend the time for filing their answer to the application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The answer will be accepted as timely filed if submitted on or before February 15, 2024.


Summaries of

Frederick v. Findling (In re Arliss)

Supreme Court of Michigan
Feb 2, 2024
SC 166487 (Mich. Feb. 2, 2024)
Case details for

Frederick v. Findling (In re Arliss)

Case Details

Full title:In re ESTATE OF CYRIL GEORGE ARLISS, also known as CYRIL ARLISS, also…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Feb 2, 2024

Citations

SC 166487 (Mich. Feb. 2, 2024)