From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frederick v. City of Johnstown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 1, 1900
47 App. Div. 221 (N.Y. App. Div. 1900)

Opinion

January Term, 1900.

M.D. Murray and R.P. Anibal, for the appellant.

Clarence E. Bloodgood, for the respondents.


By failure to file exceptions, as provided for by section 994 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and by omitting the statement that the case contained all the evidence, the appellant does not call upon this court to review either the facts or the law. ( Otten v. Manhattan R. Co., 150 N.Y. 400; Waydell v. Adams, 23 App. Div. 508.)

The exceptions taken upon the trial to the admission and to the exclusion of testimony do not call for a reversal.

All concurred.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Frederick v. City of Johnstown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 1, 1900
47 App. Div. 221 (N.Y. App. Div. 1900)
Case details for

Frederick v. City of Johnstown

Case Details

Full title:ABRAM FREDERICK, Appellant, v . THE CITY OF JOHNSTOWN and Others…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1900

Citations

47 App. Div. 221 (N.Y. App. Div. 1900)
62 N.Y.S. 66

Citing Cases

Reiners v. Niederstein

This point is made by the appellant, and we are concluded from any review of the facts or of the law, save as…

Mitchell v. Dunmore Realty Co.

Moreover, if the hearing be regarded as a trial, then it would be necessary to file an exception to the order…