Opinion
Civil Action 24-01462 (UNA)
06-17-2024
DARION DION FREDERICK, Plaintiff, v. CASHAPP, Defendant.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
TIMOTHY J. KELLY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Plaintiff, appearing pro se, has filed a Complaint, ECF No. 1, and an application to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2. The Court will grant the application and dismiss the complaint.
Plaintiff, a District of Columbia resident, has sued “CASHAPP” in San Francisco, California. Compl. Caption. In the single line comprising the one-page complaint, Plaintiff asserts “Victims of Defamation, Cyberattacks, and Privacy Infringement.” He alleges no facts and seeks no relief.
“A court may dismiss as frivolous complaints,” as here, “reciting bare legal conclusions with no suggestion of supporting facts,” Crisafi v. Holland, 655 F.2d 1305, 1307-08 (D.C. Cir. 1981), and the court is required to “dismiss the case at any time” it determines that the action is frivolous, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). Consequently, this case will be dismissed by separate order.