From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frederick v. BP Corp. N. Am.

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Sep 7, 2022
Civil Action 4:20-CV-03477 (S.D. Tex. Sep. 7, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 4:20-CV-03477

09-07-2022

CHRISTOPHER FREDERICK Plaintiff. v. BP CORPORATION NORTH AMERICA, INC., et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION

GEORGE C. HANKS JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On July 12, 2022, Defendants BP Corporation North America, Inc. and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 33) was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Andrew M. Edison under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Dkt. 35. Judge Edison filed a Memorandum and Recommendation on August 18, 2022, recommending the motion be GRANTED. Dkt. 37.

No objections have been filed to the Memorandum and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Court reviews the Memorandum and Recommendation for plain error on the face of the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3).

Based on the pleadings, the record, and the applicable law, the Court finds that there is no plain error apparent from the face of the record. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED that:

(1) Judge Edison's Memorandum and Recommendation (Dkt. 37) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its entirety as the holding of the Court; and

(2) Defendants BP Corporation North America, Inc. and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 33) is GRANTED.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Frederick v. BP Corp. N. Am.

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Sep 7, 2022
Civil Action 4:20-CV-03477 (S.D. Tex. Sep. 7, 2022)
Case details for

Frederick v. BP Corp. N. Am.

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER FREDERICK Plaintiff. v. BP CORPORATION NORTH AMERICA, INC., et…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Texas

Date published: Sep 7, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 4:20-CV-03477 (S.D. Tex. Sep. 7, 2022)