From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fredell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Mar 9, 2022
333 So. 3d 1143 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

No. 4D21-34

03-09-2022

Ryan FREDELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Cynthia L. Anderson, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rachael Kaiman, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Cynthia L. Anderson, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rachael Kaiman, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

We affirm on all arguments which the defendant has raised in his appeal from his sentence of thirty-six months in prison, with credit for 234 days' time served. Our affirmance is without prejudice to the defendant's ability to file a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion directed to defense counsel's lack of objection to judicial fact-finding on the issue of whether severe victim injury points should have been included in determining the range of the defendant's sentence. We make no statement on whether such a motion would have merit.

Affirmed.

Ciklin, Gerber and Forst, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Fredell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Mar 9, 2022
333 So. 3d 1143 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Fredell v. State

Case Details

Full title:Ryan FREDELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Date published: Mar 9, 2022

Citations

333 So. 3d 1143 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)