From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fred Weinkauff, Inc. v. Giacopelli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 4, 1985
114 A.D.2d 837 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

November 4, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Molloy, J.).


Order modified, as a matter of discretion, by providing that as a further condition of the vacatur, the judgment shall stand as security pending the disposition of the action. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Special Term did not abuse its discretion in granting defendants' motion to open the default judgment entered against them. However, under the circumstances herein, we find that the judgment should stand as security pending the disposition of the action (see, e.g., Rooney Pace, Inc. v Braverman, 74 A.D.2d 555). Niehoff, J.P., Lawrence, Eiber and Kooper, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Fred Weinkauff, Inc. v. Giacopelli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 4, 1985
114 A.D.2d 837 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Fred Weinkauff, Inc. v. Giacopelli

Case Details

Full title:FRED WEINKAUFF, INC., Appellant, v. FRANK GIACOPELLI et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 4, 1985

Citations

114 A.D.2d 837 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)