From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frazirer v. Dept. of Corrections

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 25, 2005
No. CIV S-05-1527 MCE KJM P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2005)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-1527 MCE KJM P.

October 25, 2005


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS


By an order filed August 5, 2005 plaintiff was ordered to file an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or submit the appropriate filing fees within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court's order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Any reply to the objections shall be served and filed within ten days after service of the objections. The parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Frazirer v. Dept. of Corrections

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 25, 2005
No. CIV S-05-1527 MCE KJM P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2005)
Case details for

Frazirer v. Dept. of Corrections

Case Details

Full title:RODNEI FRAZIRER, Plaintiff, v. THE DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 25, 2005

Citations

No. CIV S-05-1527 MCE KJM P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2005)