From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frazier v. Superintendent

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
Dec 23, 2013
CAUSE NO. 3:13-CV-1335-TS (N.D. Ind. Dec. 23, 2013)

Opinion

CAUSE NO. 3:13-CV-1335-TS

12-23-2013

TYRONE FRAZIER, Petitioner, v. SUPERINTENDENT, Respondent.


OPINION AND ORDER

Tyrone Frazier, a pro se prisoner, filed this habeas corpus petition attempting to challenge his guilty plea for Possession of Marijuana and his sentence of two years probation by the Marion Superior Court on March 10, 1988. To obtain habeas corpus relief, a petitioner must be "in custody." 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a). This requires that the "habeas petitioner be 'in custody' under the conviction or sentence under attack at the time his petition is filed." Maleng v. Cook, 490 U.S. 488, 490-91 (1989). Here, Frazier's probation on this conviction ended decades ago and— though he is currently in prison—he is not "in custody" on this charge. Because he is not "in custody" on the conviction he is attempting to challenge, this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction. See Id. at 493.

For the foregoing reasons, this case is DISMISSED for want of subject matter jurisdiction.

________________________

THERESA L. SPRINGMANN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FORT WAYNE DIVISION


Summaries of

Frazier v. Superintendent

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
Dec 23, 2013
CAUSE NO. 3:13-CV-1335-TS (N.D. Ind. Dec. 23, 2013)
Case details for

Frazier v. Superintendent

Case Details

Full title:TYRONE FRAZIER, Petitioner, v. SUPERINTENDENT, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

Date published: Dec 23, 2013

Citations

CAUSE NO. 3:13-CV-1335-TS (N.D. Ind. Dec. 23, 2013)