From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frazier v. Sullivan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 26, 2012
No. 2:12-cv-0932 MCE KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 26, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:12-cv-0932 MCE KJN P

07-26-2012

ALAREN L. FRAZIER, Petitioner, v. W.J. SULLIVAN, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel with an application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On June 25, 2012, respondent filed a motion to dismiss this action as barred by the statute of limitations. Petitioner has not filed an opposition to the motion. Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: "Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion . . . ."

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner show cause, within thirty days, why his failure to oppose respondent's June 25, 2012 motion to dismiss should not be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion, and he shall file an opposition. Petitioner is cautioned that failure to respond to the instant order, or to file an opposition to the pending motion to dismiss, will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.

____________________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
fraz0932.46h


Summaries of

Frazier v. Sullivan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 26, 2012
No. 2:12-cv-0932 MCE KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 26, 2012)
Case details for

Frazier v. Sullivan

Case Details

Full title:ALAREN L. FRAZIER, Petitioner, v. W.J. SULLIVAN, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 26, 2012

Citations

No. 2:12-cv-0932 MCE KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 26, 2012)