From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frazier v. Stewart

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
Dec 7, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15cv857-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Dec. 7, 2015)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15cv857-MHT (WO)

12-07-2015

JAMES CALVIN FRAZIER, Petitioner, v. CYNTHIA STEWART, Warden, et al., Respondents.


JUDGMENT

In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered today, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that:

(1) Petitioner's objections (doc. no. 5) are overruled.

(2) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (doc. no. 4) is adopted.

(3) The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. no. 1) is dismissed because the required permission has not been obtained from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals.

It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue.

The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

This case is closed.

DONE, this the 7th day of December, 2015.

/s/ Myron H. Thompson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Frazier v. Stewart

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
Dec 7, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15cv857-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Dec. 7, 2015)
Case details for

Frazier v. Stewart

Case Details

Full title:JAMES CALVIN FRAZIER, Petitioner, v. CYNTHIA STEWART, Warden, et al.…

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Dec 7, 2015

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15cv857-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Dec. 7, 2015)