From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frazier v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama
Jun 30, 1919
203 Ala. 276 (Ala. 1919)

Opinion

2 Div. 695.

June 30, 1919.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Bibb County; B. M. Miller, Judge.

Judge, Roe Charlton, of Birmingham, for appellant.

J. Q. Smith, Atty. Gen., for the State.


Section 13 of the act of 1919, p. 13, in providing for the seizure and forfeiture of vehicles, says, "which have been or are used for the illegal conveying of prohibited liquors or beverages." The proof in this case fails to show that the automobile in question had been used or was being used at the time of seizure in illegally conveying liquors or beverages so as to bring it under the forfeiture provision of the statute. The decree of the circuit court is reversed, and one is here rendered dismissing the state's petition.

Reversed and rendered.

All the Justices concur, except THOMAS, J., who dissents.


Summaries of

Frazier v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama
Jun 30, 1919
203 Ala. 276 (Ala. 1919)
Case details for

Frazier v. State

Case Details

Full title:FRAZIER v. STATE

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Jun 30, 1919

Citations

203 Ala. 276 (Ala. 1919)
82 So. 526

Citing Cases

One Black Mule v. State

The evidence was not sufficient to show that the property had been or was being used with the knowledge or…

Carey v. State

See any dictionary and also Acts 1919, p. 17, § 19; (D.C.) 154 Fed. 516; (C. C.) 191 Fed. 216. Although the…