From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frazier v. Rowell

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jun 4, 2007
No. 2:05-cv-00774-MCE-JFM-P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 4, 2007)

Opinion

No. 2:05-cv-00774-MCE-JFM-P.

June 4, 2007


ORDER


On March 9, 2007, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order filed February 22, 2007, denying plaintiff's October 12, 2006 and February 2, 2007 motions. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed February 22, 2007, is affirmed.


Summaries of

Frazier v. Rowell

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jun 4, 2007
No. 2:05-cv-00774-MCE-JFM-P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 4, 2007)
Case details for

Frazier v. Rowell

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN LAMAR FRAZIER, Plaintiff, v. SPENCER ROWELL, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jun 4, 2007

Citations

No. 2:05-cv-00774-MCE-JFM-P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 4, 2007)