From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frazier v. Redding Police Dept.

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 13, 2011
No. CIV S-11-1351 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 13, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-11-1351 GGH P.

September 13, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By order filed on July 6, 2011, plaintiff's original complaint was dismissed with leave to amend within twenty-eight days. Plaintiff filed an amended complaint on August 1, 2011; however, subsequently, plaintiff sought leave to file a further amended complaint. Plaintiff is concerned that a portion of his first amended complaint is inaccurate based on having recently received a copy of his case records/file. Although plaintiff should have attached a proposed second amended complaint with his motion, the court will grant plaintiff further leave to amend within twenty-eight days. Should plaintiff fail to amend timely, the court will proceed to screen the first amended complaint.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's September 2, 2011 (docket # 11), motion to amend the amended complaint is granted and plaintiff is hereby permitted twenty-eight days from the date of this order to file a second amended complaint; should he fail to do so, the court will proceed to screen the first amended complaint.

DATED: September 12, 2011


Summaries of

Frazier v. Redding Police Dept.

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 13, 2011
No. CIV S-11-1351 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 13, 2011)
Case details for

Frazier v. Redding Police Dept.

Case Details

Full title:MATTHEW LUCAS FRAZIER, Plaintiff, v. REDDING POLICE DEPT., et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 13, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-11-1351 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 13, 2011)