From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frazier v. Redding Police Dept

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 12, 2011
No. CIV S-11-1351 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 12, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-11-1351 GGH P

09-12-2011

MATTHEW LUCAS FRAZIER, Plaintiff, v. REDDING POLICE DEPT., et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By order filed on July 6, 2011, plaintiff's original complaint was dismissed with leave to amend within twenty-eight days. Plaintiff filed an amended complaint on August 1, 2011; however, subsequently, plaintiff sought leave to file a further amended complaint. Plaintiff is concerned that a portion of his first amended complaint is inaccurate based on having recently received a copy of his case records/file. Although plaintiff should have attached a proposed second amended complaint with his motion, the court will grant plaintiff further leave to amend within twenty-eight days. Should plaintiff fail to amend timely, the court will proceed to screen the first amended complaint.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's September 2, 2011 (docket # 11), motion to amend the amended complaint is granted and plaintiff is hereby permitted twenty-eight days from the date of this order to file a second amended complaint; should he fail to do so, the court will proceed to screen the first amended complaint.

Gregory G. Hollows

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Frazier v. Redding Police Dept

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 12, 2011
No. CIV S-11-1351 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 12, 2011)
Case details for

Frazier v. Redding Police Dept

Case Details

Full title:MATTHEW LUCAS FRAZIER, Plaintiff, v. REDDING POLICE DEPT., et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 12, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-11-1351 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 12, 2011)