From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frazier v. [No Defendants Named]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 18, 2013
Civil Action No. 13-cv-00610-LTB (D. Colo. Apr. 18, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 13-cv-00610-BNB

04-18-2013

DERRICK DARNELL FRAZIER, Plaintiff, v. [NO DEFENDANTS NAMED], Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiff, Darrick Darnell Frazier, is an inmate at the Adams County Detention Facility in Brighton, Colorado. Mr. Frazier initiated this action by filing pro se a letter to the Court (ECF No. 1) complaining that his due process rights are being violated by jail officials. Because it appeared that Mr. Frazier may be seeking judicial relief, the instant action was commenced. On March 11, 2013, Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland entered an order directing Mr. Frazier to cure certain deficiencies if he wished to pursue any claims in this Court. Specifically, Magistrate Judge Boland ordered Mr. Frazier to file a Prisoner Complaint and either to pay the $350.00 filing fee or to file a properly supported Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Mr. Frazier was warned that the action would be dismissed without further notice if he failed to cure the deficiencies within thirty days.

Mr. Frazier has failed to cure the deficiencies within the time allowed and has failed to respond in any way to Magistrate Judge Boland's March 11 order. Therefore, the action will be dismissed without prejudice for failure to cure the deficiencies.

Furthermore, the Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status will be denied for the purpose of appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962). If Plaintiff files a notice of appeal he also must pay the full $455 appellate filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit within thirty days in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 24. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the action is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure because Mr. Frazier failed to cure the deficiencies as directed. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied without prejudice to the filing of a motion seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.

DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 18th day of April, 2013.

BY THE COURT:

________________________

LEWIS T. BABCOCK, Senior Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Frazier v. [No Defendants Named]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 18, 2013
Civil Action No. 13-cv-00610-LTB (D. Colo. Apr. 18, 2013)
Case details for

Frazier v. [No Defendants Named]

Case Details

Full title:DERRICK DARNELL FRAZIER, Plaintiff, v. [NO DEFENDANTS NAMED], Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Apr 18, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 13-cv-00610-LTB (D. Colo. Apr. 18, 2013)