From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frazier v. Kofoed

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 17, 2006
No. CIV S-04-0115 MCE PAN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-04-0115 MCE PAN P.

August 17, 2006


ORDER


Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In plaintiff's reply, filed February 28, 2006, plaintiff complained he did not receive Dr. Kofoed's responses to discovery requests. However, plaintiff attached a copy of Dr. Kofoed's discovery responses as Exhibit H. On October 19, 2005, plaintiff filed a motion to compel discovery contending Dr. Kofoed's responses were insufficient. The court denied that motion to compel by order filed November 23, 2005.

On August 11, 2006, plaintiff filed a request for admissions. Plaintiff is advised that discovery is closed. Moreover, plaintiff had access to his prison central and medical files and filed detailed opposition to defendant's motion for summary judgment as well as his own motion for summary judgment. There was no further need for discovery prior to ruling on defendant Kofoed's motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, plaintiff's request for admissions will be placed in the court file and disregarded. Plaintiff shall file no further discovery requests in this action.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's February 28, 2006 request to reopen discovery is denied.


Summaries of

Frazier v. Kofoed

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 17, 2006
No. CIV S-04-0115 MCE PAN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2006)
Case details for

Frazier v. Kofoed

Case Details

Full title:RODNEI FRAZIER, Plaintiff, v. DR. JOHN KOFOED, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 17, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-04-0115 MCE PAN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2006)