Opinion
11583-22
07-25-2023
SEANN M. FRAZIER & TABITHA A. FRAZIER, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
ORDER
Kathleen Kerrigan Chief Judge
On June 29, 2022, respondent filed in the above-docketed case a Motion To Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction as to Tabitha A. Frazier, on the ground that no statutory notice of deficiency, as authorized by section 6212 and required by section 6213(a) of the Internal Revenue Code (I.R.C.) to form the basis for a petition to this Court, had been sent to petitioner Tabitha A. Frazier with respect to taxable year 2016, nor had respondent made any other determination with respect to Tabitha A. Frazier's tax year 2016 that would confer jurisdiction on this Court, as of the date the petition herein was filed. Although the Court directed petitioners to file an objection, if any, to respondent's motion to dismiss, petitioners have failed to do so. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that respondent's Motion To Dismiss For Lack of Jurisdiction as to Tabitha A. Frazier is granted. This case is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as to Tabitha A. Frazier, and references in the petition to Tabitha A. Frazier are deemed stricken. It is further
ORDERED that the caption of this case is amended to read "Seann M. Frazier, Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent".