From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frazier v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Sep 1, 2011
CIVIL NO. 2:10-cv-1987 CMK (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL NO. 2:10-cv-1987 CMK

09-01-2011

RODNEY FRAZIER, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

(As authorized via email) BESS BREWER Attorney for Plaintiff BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney DONNA L. CALVERT Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration SHEA LITA BOND Special Assistant U.S. Attorney


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

DONNA L. CALVERT

Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX

Social Security Administration

SHEA LITA BOND, SBN D.C. 469103

Special Assistant United States Attorney

333 Market Street, Suite 1500

San Francisco, California 94105

Telephone: (415) 977-8934

Facsimile: (415) 744-0134

E-Mail: Shea.Bond@ssa.gov

Attorneys for Defendant

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR

REMAND PURSUANT TO SENTENCE

FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and

REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT

IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF AND

AGAINST DEFENDANT

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that this action be remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further administrative action pursuant to section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), sentence four.

On remand, the Appeals Counsel will instruct the Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") to take the following action:

The ALJ will update the medical record with existing evidence from the treating sources, to include medical source statements; evaluate all the medical source opinions of record pursuant to the regulations; reevaluate the claimant's credibility; obtain consultative physical and psychological examinations to clarify the nature and severity of the claimant's impairments; reevaluate the severity of the claimant's physical and mental impairments at step two of the sequential evaluation; evaluate the claimant's residual functional capacity; and if warranted by the expanded record obtain vocational expert testimony at step five of the sequential evaluation.

The parties further request that the Clerk of the Court be directed to enter a final judgment in favor of plaintiff, and against defendant, Commissioner of Social Security, reversing the final decision of the Commissioner.

Respectfully submitted,

(As authorized via email)

BESS BREWER

Attorney for Plaintiff

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

DONNA L. CALVERT

Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX

Social Security Administration

SHEA LITA BOND

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
IT IS SO ORDERED:

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Frazier v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Sep 1, 2011
CIVIL NO. 2:10-cv-1987 CMK (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2011)
Case details for

Frazier v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:RODNEY FRAZIER, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION

Date published: Sep 1, 2011

Citations

CIVIL NO. 2:10-cv-1987 CMK (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2011)