From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frayer v. Williams Broth. Lawn

Court of Appeals of Virginia, Bumgardner
Feb 1, 2011
Record No. 1987-10-3 (Va. Ct. App. Feb. 1, 2011)

Opinion

Record No. 1987-10-3.

February 1, 2011.

Appeal from the Virginia Workers' Compensation Commission.

(John S. Hart, Jr.; Hart Law Offices, on brief), for appellant.

(Robert M. Himmel; Lucas Kite PLC, on brief), for appellees.

Present: Judges Kelsey, Petty and Senior Judge.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.


Richard Allen Frayer appeals a decision of the Workers' Compensation Commission finding he unjustifiably refused vocational rehabilitation services. We have reviewed the record and the commission's opinion and find this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Frayer v. Williams Bros. Lawn Tree Serv., VWC File No. 231-98-27 (Aug. 23, 2010). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Frayer v. Williams Broth. Lawn

Court of Appeals of Virginia, Bumgardner
Feb 1, 2011
Record No. 1987-10-3 (Va. Ct. App. Feb. 1, 2011)
Case details for

Frayer v. Williams Broth. Lawn

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD ALLEN FRAYER v. WILLIAMS BROTHERS LAWN TREE SERVICE AND BUILDING…

Court:Court of Appeals of Virginia, Bumgardner

Date published: Feb 1, 2011

Citations

Record No. 1987-10-3 (Va. Ct. App. Feb. 1, 2011)