From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frausto v. United States

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 7, 2023
2:23-cv-01140-RFB-NJK (D. Nev. Aug. 7, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-01140-RFB-NJK

08-07-2023

MARCO FRAUSTO, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Nancy J. Koppe United States Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff has failed to update his address. See Docket No. 5 (mail returned as undeliverable). “A party, not the district court, bears the burden of keeping the court apprised of any changes in his mailing address.” Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1441 (9th Cir. 1988); see also In re Hammer, 940 F.2d 524, 526 (9th Cir. 1991). To that end, the local rules require that litigants immediately file with the Court written notification of any change of address, and expressly warn that failure to do so may result in case-dispositive sanctions. See Local Rule IA 3-1.

Accordingly, Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to file a notice of changed address by September 7, 2023. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THIS CASE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Frausto v. United States

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 7, 2023
2:23-cv-01140-RFB-NJK (D. Nev. Aug. 7, 2023)
Case details for

Frausto v. United States

Case Details

Full title:MARCO FRAUSTO, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Aug 7, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-01140-RFB-NJK (D. Nev. Aug. 7, 2023)