From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fratus v. Peterson

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 8, 2011
No. CV-08-01500-ROS (E.D. Cal. Apr. 8, 2011)

Opinion

No. CV-08-01500-ROS.

April 8, 2011


ORDER


On January 27, 2011, the Court ordered the parties to confer and attempt to resolve their discovery disputes. (Doc. 70). The parties did so and Defendants sent supplemental responses to Plaintiff's interrogatories. Plaintiff claims the supplemental responses remain "incomplete, vague, [and] evasive." (Doc. 75 at 3). Having reviewed the supplemental responses, Defendants have properly responded to Plaintiff's interrogatories. Plaintiff is not entitled to any further responses regarding his interrogatories.

Plaintiff seeks a thirty day extension of time in which to file his opposition to the motion for summary judgment. The extension will be granted.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED the Motion to Order Defendants to Comply with Previous Court Order (Doc. 73) and Motion to Compel and Motion for Sanctions (Doc. 75) are DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Motion for Extension of Time (Doc. 77) is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file his opposition to the motion for summary judgment no later than May 16, 2011.

DATED this 7th day of April, 2011.


Summaries of

Fratus v. Peterson

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 8, 2011
No. CV-08-01500-ROS (E.D. Cal. Apr. 8, 2011)
Case details for

Fratus v. Peterson

Case Details

Full title:John Fratus, Plaintiff, v. Sergeant Peterson, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 8, 2011

Citations

No. CV-08-01500-ROS (E.D. Cal. Apr. 8, 2011)