From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frasier Frasier v. Okl. WKRS' Compensation CT

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Sep 16, 1993
1993 OK 108 (Okla. 1993)

Opinion

No. 81951.

September 16, 1993.


ORDER


Original jurisdiction is assumed and a writ of prohibition is issued to prohibit the Workers' Compensation Court from proceeding further in a dispute over which it lacks subject-matter jurisdiction. Title 85 O.S. Ch. 4, App., Rule 34. Rule 34 limits the Workers' Compensation Court to deciding two disputes regarding attorney fees: (1) identity of counsel of record and (2) the allocation of fees among successive counsel. The issue here involves a law firm's dispute over allocation of fees under a complex financial agreement between associated attorneys concerning a share of net profits in a multi-member law firm. The Workers' Compensation Court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction to determine the rights, relationships, and money due under such contractual arrangements now in litigation in a district court action. Subject to further modification by order of the District Court, petitioner law firm shall deposit all fees awarded by the respondent-court in a trust account whose distribution shall await the end or settlement of the dispute between affected counsel.

All Justices concur.


Summaries of

Frasier Frasier v. Okl. WKRS' Compensation CT

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Sep 16, 1993
1993 OK 108 (Okla. 1993)
Case details for

Frasier Frasier v. Okl. WKRS' Compensation CT

Case Details

Full title:FRASIER FRASIER, PETITIONER, v. THE OKLAHOMA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COURT…

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Sep 16, 1993

Citations

1993 OK 108 (Okla. 1993)
1993 OK 108

Citing Cases

Garrett v. Bell

Original jurisdiction is assumed. Let a writ issue prohibiting the Workers’ Compensation Court of Existing…

Garrett v. Bell

Original jurisdiction is assumed. Let a writ issue prohibiting the Workers' Compensation Court of Existing…