From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fraser v. Cummings

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Two
Jul 14, 1920
48 Cal.App. 797 (Cal. Ct. App. 1920)

Opinion

Civ. No. 3521.

July 14, 1920.

PROCEEDING in Mandamus to compel a city clerk to certify a recall petition. Petition denied and alternative writ discharged.

This case presents the same issues as those involved in Fraser v. Cummings, ante, p. 504.

De Lancey C. Smith for Petitioner.

H. L. Hagan, City Attorney, and T. J. Ledwich, Deputy City Attorney, for Respondent.


[1] The above-entitled cause presents the same issues as those involved in Fraser v. Cummings, ante, p. 504, [192 P. 100], and for the reasons therein given the petition is denied and the alternative writ discharged.


Summaries of

Fraser v. Cummings

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Two
Jul 14, 1920
48 Cal.App. 797 (Cal. Ct. App. 1920)
Case details for

Fraser v. Cummings

Case Details

Full title:L. C. FRASER, Petitioner, v. L. W. CUMMINGS, as City Clerk, etc.…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Two

Date published: Jul 14, 1920

Citations

48 Cal.App. 797 (Cal. Ct. App. 1920)
48 Cal.App. 796
292 P. 102
292 P. 160