From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fraser v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 8, 1996
226 A.D.2d 424 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

April 8, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Krausman, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, the repair order of the Department of Transportation, dated June 2, 1987, did not provide prior written notice of the condition which led to the plaintiff's injuries as required by New York City Administrative Code § 7-201 (c) (2). The repair order merely indicated that there were holes in a stretch of roadway which exceeded 400 feet in length. Thus, the repair order failed to bring the particular condition at issue to the attention of the defendant ( see, Weinreb v. City of New York, 193 A.D.2d 596). Mangano, P.J., Thompson, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Fraser v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 8, 1996
226 A.D.2d 424 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Fraser v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:LORNA FRASER, Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 8, 1996

Citations

226 A.D.2d 424 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
640 N.Y.S.2d 607

Citing Cases

Sheikh v. City of N.Y.

"As a matter of law, neither constructive notice nor written notice of defects near the site suffices to…

Sheikh v. City of N.Y.

In addition to the City having had fifteen days to address the designated street defect, any complaint must…