Opinion
3:22-cv-00401-MMD-CLB
01-03-2023
ROBERT FRANZEN, Plaintiff, v. UNITED FINANCIAL CASUALTY COMPANY, a corporation; and DOES I through X, and ROE Corporations I through X, inclusive, Defendants.
BARRON & PRUITT, LLP GOLIGHTLY & VANNAH, PLLC JOSEPH R. MESERVY, ESQ. ROBERT D. VANNAH, ESQ.
BARRON & PRUITT, LLP
GOLIGHTLY & VANNAH, PLLC
JOSEPH R. MESERVY, ESQ.
ROBERT D. VANNAH, ESQ.
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO STAY CASE PENDING BINDING AEBITRATION
Defendant UNITED FINANCIAL CASUALTY COMPANY (“Defendant”), by and through its attorneys, Barron & Pruitt, LLP, and Plaintiff ROBERT FRANZEN, by and through his attorneys, Golightly & Vannah, PLLC, stipulate to the following:
The parties have agreed and stipulate that, pursuant to the subject policy, Mr. Franzen's claim for UIM benefit is subject to binding arbitration. As such, the parties have agreed to a binding arbitration to resolve Mr. Franzen's UIM claim.
The parties further stipulate to stay Plaintiff's remaining claims before this court until such time that the binding arbitration has been completed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.