From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frantz v. McGonagle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 30, 1997
242 A.D.2d 888 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

September 30, 1997

Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Mahoney, J.

Present — Denman, P.J., Hayes, Callahan, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.


Supreme Court properly denied the cross motion of Patrick H. Moreton (defendant) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against him. Plaintiff's son, an infant, was bitten by a dog, a pitbull/rottweiler or german shepherd mix, harbored by defendant's tenants. Plaintiff's son testified at his examination before trial that the dog had bitten him on a prior occasion and that defendant had observed that incident from a distance of about 22 feet. Plaintiff submitted an affidavit of a neighbor of defendant indicating that defendant was present on a prior occasion when the dog growled at defendant's grandchildren. Defendant's denial that either incident occurred presents an issue of credibility that must be determined by the trier of fact. Moreover, plaintiff submitted evidence that "Beware of Dog" signs were posted on the property owned by defendant, of which defendant was aware. Although the presence of the signs, standing alone, is not sufficient to impute notice to defendant (see, Arcara v. Whytas, 219 A.D.2d 871, 872), that evidence in combination with the other evidence is sufficient to raise an issue of fact concerning defendant's prior knowledge of the dog's vicious propensities (see, Cronin v. Chrosniak, 145 A.D.2d 906).


Summaries of

Frantz v. McGonagle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 30, 1997
242 A.D.2d 888 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Frantz v. McGonagle

Case Details

Full title:JAY W. FRANTZ, an Infant, by His Mother and Natural Guardian, VICKI L…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Sep 30, 1997

Citations

242 A.D.2d 888 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
662 N.Y.S.2d 336

Citing Cases

Rothstein v. Zhigun

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs. The Supreme Court properly denied the defendants' motion for…

Opderbeck v. Bush

Both defendants admitted that there were three "Beware of Dog" signs posted on their premises. Thus, taken…