From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Franklin v. Unknown

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 16, 2022
2:22-cv-00825-TLN-JDP (E.D. Cal. Oct. 16, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-00825-TLN-JDP

10-16-2022

CHRISTOPHER FRANKLIN, Petitioner, v. UNKNOWN, Respondent.


ORDER

TROY L. NUNLEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On July 19, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 20.) Petitioner has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 28.)

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed July 19, 2022 (ECF No. 20) are ADOPTED in full; and
2. Petitioner's Request for Injunctive Relief (ECF No. 15) is DENIED.


Summaries of

Franklin v. Unknown

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 16, 2022
2:22-cv-00825-TLN-JDP (E.D. Cal. Oct. 16, 2022)
Case details for

Franklin v. Unknown

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER FRANKLIN, Petitioner, v. UNKNOWN, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Oct 16, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-00825-TLN-JDP (E.D. Cal. Oct. 16, 2022)