Opinion
Civil Action 23-2002 (SDW) (CLW)
01-23-2024
EDWINA FRANKLIN, Plaintiff, v. THE JERSEY CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT Defendants.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
OPINION
SUSAN D. WIGENTON, U.S.D.J.
THIS MATTER having come before this Court upon pro se Plaintiff Edwina Franklin's (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Default Judgment (D.E. 23 (“Motion”)) against Defendant the Jersey City Housing Authority (“the JCHA”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 55(b)(2); and
WHEREAS Plaintiff filed her first Complaint against the JCHA (D.E. 1) on April 5, 2023. Plaintiff then filed an Amended Complaint (D.E. 9) against the JCHA on May 3, 2023. On June 20, 2023, Plaintiff obtained an entry of default against the JCHA for failure to plead or otherwise respond. To date, the JCHA has not filed an answer or otherwise defended itself in this action; and
WHEREAS on September 20, 2023, Magistrate Judge Waldor entered an order to consolidate this action with Franklin v. Secretary, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 2:23-cv-20357-SDW-CLW. As a result, Plaintiff filed her Consolidated and Amended Complaint against the JCHA and Defendant Secretary, Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) in this action on October 17, 2023, (D.E. 17), and filed proof of service upon the JCHA (D.E. 20) on November 7, 2023. The Consolidated and Amended Complaint alleges violations of the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act by the JCHA and HUD. (See generally D.E. 17); and
WHEREAS the Third Circuit has clearly stated that “[p]rior to obtaining a default judgment under either Rule 55(b)(1) or Rule 55(b)(2), there must be an entry of default as provided by Rule 55(a).” Husain v. Casino Control Comm'n, 265 Fed.Appx. 130, 133 (3d Cir. 2008) (quoting 10A Charles Alan Wright, Arthur R. Miller, Mary Kay Kane, Federal Practice and Procedure § 2682 (2007)); see also Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. Starlight Ballroom Dance Club, Inc., 175 Fed.Appx. 519, 521, n.1 (3d Cir. 2006) (same); and
WHEREAS Plaintiff's Motion fails because, at the time she filed her Motion, an entry of default against the JCHA had not yet been issued under Rule 55(a). Because Plaintiff filed a Consolidated and Amended Complaint against the JCHA after this Court entered a default against the JCHA for failure to plead or otherwise respond, she must request a default against the JCHA again before she can move for default judgment. Accordingly, this Court will dismiss Plaintiff's Motion; therefore
Plaintiffs' Motion is DISMISSED without prejudice. An appropriate order follows.
Cathy L. Waldor, U.S.M.J.