From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Franklin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Aug 17, 2022
348 So. 3d 10 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

No. 1D22-1093

08-17-2022

Joshua D. FRANKLIN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Joshua D. Franklin, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Joshua D. Franklin, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The Court dismisses the petition for writ of mandamus for failing to plead a clear legal right to the requested relief. See Heath v. Becktell , 327 So. 2d 3, 4 (Fla. 1976). The petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed. See Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(m).

B.L. Thomas, Kelsey, and Winokur, Jj., Concur.


Summaries of

Franklin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Aug 17, 2022
348 So. 3d 10 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Franklin v. State

Case Details

Full title:Joshua D. FRANKLIN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Aug 17, 2022

Citations

348 So. 3d 10 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)