From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Franklin v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, First District
Aug 17, 2022
No. 1D22-1093 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Aug. 17, 2022)

Opinion

1D22-1093

08-17-2022

Joshua D. Franklin, Petitioner, v. State of Florida, Respondent.

Joshua D. Franklin, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus-Original Jurisdiction.

Joshua D. Franklin, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

The Court dismisses the petition for writ of mandamus for failing to plead a clear legal right to the requested relief. See Heath v. Becktell, 327 So.2d 3, 4 (Fla. 1976). The petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed. See Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(m).

B.L. Thomas, Kelsey, and Winokur, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Franklin v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, First District
Aug 17, 2022
No. 1D22-1093 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Aug. 17, 2022)
Case details for

Franklin v. State

Case Details

Full title:Joshua D. Franklin, Petitioner, v. State of Florida, Respondent.

Court:Florida Court of Appeals, First District

Date published: Aug 17, 2022

Citations

No. 1D22-1093 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Aug. 17, 2022)