From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Franklin v. Robinson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Oct 3, 2015
Case No. 3:12-cv-312 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 3, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 3:12-cv-312

10-03-2015

ANTONIO SANCHEZ FRANKLIN, Petitioner, v. NORMAN ROBINSON, Warden, Respondent.



Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 19)

This case is before the Court on Respondent's motion to dismiss Petitioner's habeas petition (Doc. 15), and the parties' responsive memoranda (Docs. 17, 18). On September 10, 2015, United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz, to whom this case is referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), issued his Report and Recommendations as to Respondent's motion, recommending that the habeas petition be dismissed without prejudice and that Petitioner be granted leave to move to file an amended petition no later than September 30, 2015. (Doc. 19). No objections were filed to the Report and Recommendations, and the time for such filings expired on September 28, 2015. (Id.; see Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)).

On September 30, 2015, Petitioner filed an amended habeas corpus petition. (Doc. 20). Respondent immediately moved to strike the petition, arguing that the Report and Recommendations proposed granting leave to move to file an amended petition. (Doc. 21). On October 1, 2015, Magistrate Judge Merz granted by notation order Respondent's motion to strike. (See Not. Order, Oct. 1, 2015). Additionally, however, Magistrate Judge Merz, sua sponte, extended the deadline for Petitioner to move to file an amended petition to October 6, 2015. (Id.)

As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court determines that such Report and Recommendations (Doc. 19) should be, and is hereby, ADOPTED in its entirety, but for the deadline by which Petitioner must move to file an amended petition, which was extended per the Magistrate Judge's October 1, 2015 notation order. Accordingly, Petitioner is granted leave to move to file an amended petition no later than October 6, 2015, which conforms to the requirements set forth in the Report and Recommendations and the Magistrate Judge's subsequent Notation Order of October 1, 2015.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 10/3/15

s/ Timothy S . Black

Timothy S. Black

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Franklin v. Robinson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Oct 3, 2015
Case No. 3:12-cv-312 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 3, 2015)
Case details for

Franklin v. Robinson

Case Details

Full title:ANTONIO SANCHEZ FRANKLIN, Petitioner, v. NORMAN ROBINSON, Warden…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Oct 3, 2015

Citations

Case No. 3:12-cv-312 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 3, 2015)