From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Franklin v. Porter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 5, 1993
190 A.D.2d 1036 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

February 5, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Chautauqua County, Ricotta, J.

Present — Denman, P.J., Pine, Balio, Fallon and Davis, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: On May 1, 1988, plaintiff Donald R. Franklin, Sr., was standing next to one of two gasoline pumps located in front of Cave's Variety Store. The pumps were partially in the right of way at the intersection of County Roads 380 and 324 in the Town of Stockton. Defendant Porter drove into the intersection and struck a van driven by defendant Waite, which van in turn struck plaintiff Donald Franklin, Sr., a gas pump and the store. Plaintiffs commenced this action against defendants, alleging with respect to the Caves, individually and doing business as Cave's Variety Store, that he was their invitee and that they were negligent in permitting a dangerous instrumentality to exist on their premises without protective devices or warnings.

The court properly denied the Caves' motion for summary judgment. The Caves failed to meet their initial burden of proving entitlement to summary judgment because it cannot be said as a matter of law that the placement of the gas pumps did not create a foreseeable risk of harm to plaintiff, or that the placement of the pumps was not a proximate cause of the accident (see, Derdiarian v Felix Contr. Corp., 51 N.Y.2d 308, 315, rearg denied 52 N.Y.2d 784; cf., Tomassi v Town of Union, 46 N.Y.2d 91; Kinne v State of New York, 8 A.D.2d 903, affd 8 N.Y.2d 1068).


Summaries of

Franklin v. Porter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 5, 1993
190 A.D.2d 1036 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Franklin v. Porter

Case Details

Full title:DONALD R. FRANKLIN, SR., et al., Respondents, v. TIMOTHY L. PORTER et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 5, 1993

Citations

190 A.D.2d 1036 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
593 N.Y.S.2d 658

Citing Cases

Sorrentino v. County of Suffolk

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof denying that branch of the…

Di Ponzio v. Riordan

The court held that the incident was not foreseeable as a matter of law ( Spurlock v. Schwegmann Bros. Giant…