From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Franklin v. McDonnell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 9, 2019
NO. CV 16-1192-CAS (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2019)

Opinion

NO. CV 16-1192-CAS (AGR)

01-09-2019

DAMON EARL FRANKLIN, Plaintiff, v. SHERIFF JIM McDONNELL, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the complaint, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Plaintiff has objected and Defendants replied. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that (1) Defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted; and (2) judgment is entered dismissing this action without prejudice for failure to exhaust remedies. DATED: 1/9/2019

/s/_________

CHRISTINA A. SNYDER

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Franklin v. McDonnell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 9, 2019
NO. CV 16-1192-CAS (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2019)
Case details for

Franklin v. McDonnell

Case Details

Full title:DAMON EARL FRANKLIN, Plaintiff, v. SHERIFF JIM McDONNELL, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 9, 2019

Citations

NO. CV 16-1192-CAS (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2019)