From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Franklin v. Madden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 4, 2018
Case No. CV 17-4281 DSF(JC) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 4, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. CV 17-4281 DSF(JC)

04-04-2018

DEMETRIUS FRANKLIN, Petitioner, v. RAYMOND MADDEN, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody ("Petition") and supporting documents, the parties' submissions in connection with the Motion to Stay, and all of the records herein, including the January 29, 2018 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report and Recommendation"). The Court approves and accepts the Report and Recommendation.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that (1) the Petition and this action are dismissed with prejudice because petitioner's claims are barred by the statute of limitations; (2) the Motion to Stay is denied as moot; and (3) the Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. ///

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order, the Report and Recommendation, and the Judgment herein on petitioner and counsel for respondent.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: 4/4/18

/s/_________

HONORABLE DALE S. FISCHER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Franklin v. Madden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 4, 2018
Case No. CV 17-4281 DSF(JC) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 4, 2018)
Case details for

Franklin v. Madden

Case Details

Full title:DEMETRIUS FRANKLIN, Petitioner, v. RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 4, 2018

Citations

Case No. CV 17-4281 DSF(JC) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 4, 2018)