From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Franklin v. Knox

The Supreme Court of Washington
Jun 10, 1930
288 P. 924 (Wash. 1930)

Opinion

No. 22342. Department One.

June 10, 1930.

APPEAL AND ERROR (222) — REQUISITES — PROOF OF SERVICE. An appeal will be dismissed on motion, where the record fails to show service of the notice of appeal within thirty days after entry of the judgment or at all.

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Lewis county, Reynolds, J., entered September 16, 1929, upon findings in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action on contract, tried to the court. Appeal dismissed.

Gus L. Thacker, for appellants.

Fred M. Bond, for respondents.


Respondents have embodied in their brief a motion to dismiss the appeal and affirm the judgment upon the ground that the notice of appeal was not served upon respondents or their attorney within thirty days after the entry of the judgment, or at all.

The judgment from which the attempt is made to appeal was entered on September 16, 1929. A notice of appeal in due form was prepared and signed under date of September 24, 1929, and on the same day it was filed in the office of the clerk of the superior court. No proof of service thereof was ever filed, and the record clearly establishes that no service of the notice was ever made or attempted to be made.

[1] A notice of appeal which was never served, even though filed in time, was of course an absolute nullity, and, in the absence of any notice of appeal, served and filed within the time fixed by the rules, no jurisdiction was conferred upon this court. Nudd v. Fuller, 150 Wn. 389, 273 P. 200; Lindsay v. Scott, 56 Wn. 206, 105 P. 462; Mathison v. Anderson, 107 Wn. 617, 182 P. 622; Metropolitan Club v. Massachusetts Bonding Insurance Co., 127 Wn. 320, 220 P. 818.

The appeal is dismissed.


Summaries of

Franklin v. Knox

The Supreme Court of Washington
Jun 10, 1930
288 P. 924 (Wash. 1930)
Case details for

Franklin v. Knox

Case Details

Full title:C.F. FRANKLIN et al., Respondents, v. C.E. KNOX et al., Appellants

Court:The Supreme Court of Washington

Date published: Jun 10, 1930

Citations

288 P. 924 (Wash. 1930)
288 P. 924
157 Wash. 349

Citing Cases

Peddicord v. Lieser

[1] The giving of a notice of appeal, or cross-appeal, as required by Rule V and Rem. Rev. Stat., § 1719, is…

MacVeigh v. Unemployment Comp

" In the case of Franklin v. Knox, 157 Wn. 349, 288 P. 924, this court dismissed an appeal, saying: "The…