From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Franklin v. Horel

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 30, 2007
256 F. App'x 186 (9th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 07-15428.

Submitted November 26, 2007.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed November 30, 2007.

Jeffrey Franklin, Crescent City, CA, pro se.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; Susan Yvonne Illston, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-06-06791-SI.

Before: LEAVY, BERZON, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.



MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


On August 6, 2007, this court concluded that, to the extent a certificate of appealability is required in this appeal, the request for a certificate of appealability is denied. By same order, this court determined that, to the extent a certificate of appealability is unnecessary because appellant's claim arises under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, appellant shall show cause as to why the district court's December 20, 2006, judgment should not be summarily affirmed.

A review of appellant's response to the court's order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).

Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court's judgment.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Franklin v. Horel

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 30, 2007
256 F. App'x 186 (9th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

Franklin v. Horel

Case Details

Full title:Jeffrey FRANKLIN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Robert HOREL…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Nov 30, 2007

Citations

256 F. App'x 186 (9th Cir. 2007)