Franklin v. Foulk

Full title: JOHNNY L. FRANKLIN, Plaintiff, v. F. FOULK, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 12, 2015

2:14-cv-0057 KJM AC P (TEMP) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 12, 2015)

Opinion

JOHNNY L. FRANKLIN, Plaintiff, v. F. FOULK, et al., Defendants. No. 2:14-cv-0057 KJM AC P (TEMP) United States District Court, E.D. California. November 12, 2015

          ORDER

          ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.

         Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action. Plaintiff has filed a motion for a settlement conference. Plaintiff is advised that, unless both parties in this case request this court to conduct a settlement conference, the court will not schedule a court-supervised settlement conference until after the court has ruled on any forthcoming dispositive motions.

         Plaintiff has also filed a motion for a trial. Plaintiff is advised that the court will schedule this matter for pretrial conference and trial, as appropriate, following adjudication of any forthcoming dispositive motion (or the expiration of time for filing such a motion) and any court-supervised settlement conference.

         Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. Plaintiff's motion for a settlement conference (Doc. No. 61) is denied without prejudice; and

         2. Plaintiff's motion for a trial (Doc. No. 62) is denied without prejudice.