From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Franklin v. Drug Enforcement Administration

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jul 16, 2015
CV 14-03701-CBM (KKx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 16, 2015)

Opinion

          Gregory Franklin, Plaintiff, Pro se, Lancaster, CA.

          For Drug Enforcement Administration, Katherine L. Myrick, DEA, Defendant: Matthew P Lane, AUSA - Office of U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA.


          PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS)

          HON. KENLY KIYA KATO, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

         The Defendants' Ex Parte Application for a Protective Order has been referred by the District Judge to the Magistrate Judge for consideration. Defendants seek an order precluding Plaintiff from conducting discovery without leave of the Court.

         Plaintiff is, therefore, directed to file an opposition (or statement of nonopposition) no later than July 24, 2015. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file an opposition may be deemed consent to the granting of the application. See Local Rule 7-12.


Summaries of

Franklin v. Drug Enforcement Administration

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jul 16, 2015
CV 14-03701-CBM (KKx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 16, 2015)
Case details for

Franklin v. Drug Enforcement Administration

Case Details

Full title:Gregory Franklin v. Drug Enforcement Administration, et al

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Jul 16, 2015

Citations

CV 14-03701-CBM (KKx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 16, 2015)