From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Franklin v. Chenango Cnty. Pub. Def.'s Office

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Nov 5, 2018
3:18-cv-00865 (BKS/DEP) (N.D.N.Y. Nov. 5, 2018)

Opinion

3:18-cv-00865 (BKS/DEP)

11-05-2018

ERNEST F. FRANKLIN, II, Plaintiff, v. CHENANGO COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE et al., Defendants.

Appearances: Ernest F. Franklin, II Chenango County Jail 279 County Road 46 Norwich, NY 13815 Plaintiff pro se


Appearances:

Ernest F. Franklin, II
Chenango County Jail
279 County Road 46
Norwich, NY 13815
Plaintiff pro se Hon. Brenda K. Sannes, United States District Judge :

MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER

Plaintiff Ernest Franklin, II, a county inmate, commenced this civil rights action asserting claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Dkt. No. 1). This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles, who, on September 7, 2018, issued an Order, Report, and Recommendation (the "Report-Recommendation") recommending that Plaintiff's claims against all five named Defendants be dismissed, with leave to replead. (Dkt. No. 11). Magistrate Judge Peebles advised Plaintiff that under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) he had 14 days within which to file written objections to the Report-Recommendation, and that the failure to object to the Report-Recommendation within 14 days would preclude appellate review. (Dkt. No. 11, at 19). No objections to the Report-Recommendation have been filed.

As no objections to the Report-Recommendation have been filed, and the time for filing objections has expired, the Court reviews the Report-Recommendation for clear error. See Petersen v. Astrue, 2 F. Supp. 3d 223, 228-29 (N.D.N.Y. 2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee's note to 1983 amendment. Having reviewed the Report-Recommendation for clear error and found none, the Court adopts it in its entirety.

For these reasons, it is

ORDERED that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 11) is ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further

ORDERED that Plaintiff's claims against all five named Defendants are DISMISSED, with leave to replead; and it is further

ORDERED that Plaintiff may file an amended complaint within 30 days from the date of this Order; and it is further

ORDERED that, if Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days from the date of this Order or to request an extension of time to do so, the Clerk is directed to enter judgment without further order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon Plaintiff in accordance with the Local Rules.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 5, 2018

Syracuse, New York

/s/ _________

Brenda K. Sannes

U.S. District Judge


Summaries of

Franklin v. Chenango Cnty. Pub. Def.'s Office

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Nov 5, 2018
3:18-cv-00865 (BKS/DEP) (N.D.N.Y. Nov. 5, 2018)
Case details for

Franklin v. Chenango Cnty. Pub. Def.'s Office

Case Details

Full title:ERNEST F. FRANKLIN, II, Plaintiff, v. CHENANGO COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDERS…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Nov 5, 2018

Citations

3:18-cv-00865 (BKS/DEP) (N.D.N.Y. Nov. 5, 2018)