From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Franklin v. Bearden

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Mar 4, 2019
No. A-1-CA-37536 (N.M. Ct. App. Mar. 4, 2019)

Opinion

No. A-1-CA-37536

03-04-2019

BRYCE FRANKLIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CLIFFORD BEARDEN, Defendant-Appellee.

Bryce Franklin Santa Rosa, NM Pro Se Appellant Clifford Bearden Grants, NM Pro Se Appellee


This decision was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of non-precedential dispositions. Please also note that this electronic decision may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Supreme Court. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CIBOLA COUNTY
Pedro G. Rael, District Judge Bryce Franklin
Santa Rosa, NM Pro Se Appellant Clifford Bearden
Grants, NM Pro Se Appellee

MEMORANDUM OPINION

VANZI, Judge. {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

{2} AFFIRMED.

{3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ _________

LINDA M. VANZI, Judge

WE CONCUR:

/s/ _________
JACQUELINE R. MEDINA, Judge /s/ _________
MEGAN P. DUFFY, Judge


Summaries of

Franklin v. Bearden

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Mar 4, 2019
No. A-1-CA-37536 (N.M. Ct. App. Mar. 4, 2019)
Case details for

Franklin v. Bearden

Case Details

Full title:BRYCE FRANKLIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CLIFFORD BEARDEN…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

Date published: Mar 4, 2019

Citations

No. A-1-CA-37536 (N.M. Ct. App. Mar. 4, 2019)