Opinion
Argued February 3, 1926 —
Decided June 23, 1926.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported ante, p. 9.
For the appellant, Harry A. Augenblick.
For the respondent, William B. Harley.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Gummere in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — TRENCHARD, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, GARDNER, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 7.
For reversal — KALISCH, BLACK, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, JJ. 4.