From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Franklin Dale Church v. Bowden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Feb 20, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-772-JJB-SCR (M.D. La. Feb. 20, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-772-JJB-SCR

02-20-2013

FRANKLIN DALE CHURCH (#11086) v. DETECTIVE CALVIN BOWDEN, ET AL.


RULING

The court has carefully considered the petition, the record, the law applicable to this action, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Steven L. Riediinger dated January 14, 2013 (doc. no. 6) to which no objection has been filed.

The court hereby approves the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and adopts it as the court's opinion herein. Accordingly, the plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(l) and (iii).

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, this 20thday of February, 2013.

________

JAMES J. BRADY, JUDGE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

Franklin Dale Church v. Bowden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Feb 20, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-772-JJB-SCR (M.D. La. Feb. 20, 2013)
Case details for

Franklin Dale Church v. Bowden

Case Details

Full title:FRANKLIN DALE CHURCH (#11086) v. DETECTIVE CALVIN BOWDEN, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Feb 20, 2013

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-772-JJB-SCR (M.D. La. Feb. 20, 2013)

Citing Cases

Sealand Inv. Corp. v. Emprise, Inc.

The minority of the board, and any single member of it, is not divested of his office or of its powers and…