From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frankfurth v. Sunstar Foods, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Nov 21, 1984
358 N.W.2d 53 (Minn. 1984)

Opinion

Nos. C7-83-1533, C0-83-1535.

November 21, 1984.

Review of Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals.

Timothy J. McCoy, Minneapolis, for relator Frankfurth.

Randee S. Held, Minneapolis, for relator Armour and Co.

Jeffrey B. Nelson, Minneapolis, for respondents Sunstar Foods Inc. Home Ins. Co.

Mark M. Suby, St. Paul, for respondents Sunstar Foods Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.

James M. Christenson, Minneapolis, for respondent Prudential Ins. Co.

Peter F. Nelson, St. Paul, for respondent Special Compensation Fund.

Considered and decided by the court en banc without oral argument.


OPINION


Ronald Frankfurth has received compensation for an injury sustained while employed by Armour and Company. Frankfurth was subsequently employed by Sunstar where both he and Armour claim a new injury occurred. The compensation judge held that no new injury had occurred. The Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals affirmed.

We hold that the Court of Appeals applied the proper standard of review and that the decision is not manifestly contrary to the evidence. See Hengemuhle v. Long Prairie Jaycees, 358 N.W.2d 54 (Minn. 1984) (filed herewith).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Frankfurth v. Sunstar Foods, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Nov 21, 1984
358 N.W.2d 53 (Minn. 1984)
Case details for

Frankfurth v. Sunstar Foods, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Ronald FRANKFURTH, Relator (CO-83-1535), v. SUNSTAR FOODS, INC., and…

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Nov 21, 1984

Citations

358 N.W.2d 53 (Minn. 1984)