From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frankel v. Thibault

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 17, 1996
668 So. 2d 214 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 95-2434.

January 17, 1996.

Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court, Broward County; Leroy H. Moe, Judge.

Jeremy A. Koss and Kenneth P. Kerr of Buchanan Ingersoll Professional Corporation, North Miami Beach, for appellant.

Edward Paul Kreiling of Rosen, Rosen Kreiling, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.


Appellant, intervenor below, appeals the issuance of a temporary injunction and appeals a non-final order denying his motion to dissolve the same. We affirm in all respects except we reverse and remand to allow the trial court an opportunity to make an express finding as to whether the movant has an adequate remedy at law. See City of Jacksonville v. Naegele Outdoor Advertising Co., 634 So.2d 750 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994), approved, 659 So.2d 1046 (Fla. 1995).

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.

STONE and WARNER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Frankel v. Thibault

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 17, 1996
668 So. 2d 214 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Frankel v. Thibault

Case Details

Full title:GARY FRANKEL, APPELLANT, v. KATHERINE THIBAULT, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jan 17, 1996

Citations

668 So. 2d 214 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)