From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frankel v. 71st St. Lexington Corp.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department, New York.
Mar 4, 2015
13 N.Y.S.3d 850 (N.Y. App. Term 2015)

Opinion

No. 570015/15.

03-04-2015

Eric FRANKEL, individually and as Executor of the Estate of Gloria Frankel, deceased, Petitioner–Appellant, v. 71ST STREET LEXINGTON CORPORATION, Sanford Potters and Suzanne Potters, Respondents–Respondents, and Department of Housing Preservation and Development of the City of New York, Respondent.


Opinion

Order (Peter M. Wendt, J.), dated March 15, 2013, affirmed, with $10 costs, for the reasons stated by Peter M. Wendt, J. at Civil Court.

We sustain the dismissal of this January 2012 Housing Part enforcement proceeding, where the record evidence, including inspection reports prepared by two municipal agencies, established beyond cavil that there are no existing record violations in connection with petitioner's apartment, and as relevant herein, “no excessive or unreasonable noise.”

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.

I concur.


Summaries of

Frankel v. 71st St. Lexington Corp.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department, New York.
Mar 4, 2015
13 N.Y.S.3d 850 (N.Y. App. Term 2015)
Case details for

Frankel v. 71st St. Lexington Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Eric FRANKEL, individually and as Executor of the Estate of Gloria…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 4, 2015

Citations

13 N.Y.S.3d 850 (N.Y. App. Term 2015)