From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frank v. Tuthill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 1, 1934
241 App. Div. 720 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)

Opinion

March, 1934.

Present — Finch, P.J., Martin, O'Malley, Townley and Glennon, JJ.


Order reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The order of arrest in a personal injury case rests in the sound discretion of the court. The record on this application does not justify the exercise of such discretion in favor of the plaintiff. (See Gelles v. Rosenbaum, 141 Misc. 588; Levy v. Bernhard, 2 App. Div. 336; Reiss v. Levy, 165 id. 1.)


Summaries of

Frank v. Tuthill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 1, 1934
241 App. Div. 720 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)
Case details for

Frank v. Tuthill

Case Details

Full title:HORTENSE C. FRANK, Respondent, v. THOMAS A. TUTHILL, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1934

Citations

241 App. Div. 720 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)

Citing Cases

White v. Denny

However, these authorities merely hold that under the provisions of article 5 of the Debtor and Creditor Law,…

Gluck Co. v. Tankel

Similarly, the use of the word "may" in section 826 of the Civil Practice Act, has been construed as vesting…